Legal Opinion

Vinson v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1995No. 19493PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROW, Judge.

Gregory A. Vinson (“Vinson”) was notified that the Director of Revenue (“Director”) was revoking Vinson’s driving privilege because Vinson refused to submit to a chemical test on December 24, 1993, to determine his “blood alcohol content.”

Vinson filed a petition for a hearing per § 577.041, RSMo Cum.Supp.1993, which reads, in pertinent part:

“1. ... The request of the arresting officer ... shall inform the person ... that his license shall be immediately revoked upon his refusal to take the test....

4. ... At the hearing the judge shall determine only:(1) Whether or not the person…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Askins v. JamesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Delaney v. Missouri Department of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Teson v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1996
  2. Eyberg v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. Cates v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. State v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Chrin v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API