Legal Opinion

United States v. Karl L. Dahlstrom, R. Bruce Ripley, Hiram E. Conley, David J. Morris, and Gaze Durst

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1983No. 82-1137, 82-1141, 82-1138, 82-1142 and 82-1143PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALARCON, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Dahlstrom, Ripley, Conley, Morris and Durst were convicted by a jury of conspiracy to defraud the United States, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and of aiding and abetting the preparation and presentation of fraudulent income tax returns. 26 U.S.C. § 7206(2). Each appellant contends the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction as to the crimes charged against him. We agree.

I. STANDARD OF REVIEW

In determining whether a jury verdict rests on sufficient evidence, a review*1425ing court must view the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution and determine…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brandenburg v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. PomponioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. George v. Zmuda and Walburga Zmuda v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  2. Dahlstrom v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1985
  3. United States v. F. Thomas Little, United States of America v. Peter Chernik, United States of America v. Harold GrutchfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Universal City Studios, Inc. v. CorleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. United States v. Robert E. Iles, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API