Legal Opinion
Bowling, James & Bell v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 6, 1958No. 5-1594PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Carleton Harris, Chief Justice.
The question in this case is whether, under the facts hereinafter enumerated, the State of Arkansas was entitled to forfeiture on the bond of James A. “Dock” Bowling, said bond having been executed by appellants, Russell James and Earl Bell, along with Bowling.
Appellant Bowling was arrested in the Western District of Clay County on a charge of possessing stolen goods, and was released upon making bail in the sum of $5,000, said bond being executed by appellants J ames and Bell. Upon his release, Bowling left Clay County, and went to his home in Missouri. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Belding v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1869
3Cited by5 opinions
- United Bonding Ins. Co. v. City Court of City of TucsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
- State v. MitchellSuperior Court of Delaware · 1965
- State v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 1968
- Seneca Surety Co., Inc., Dba Eydie's Bail Bonds, Through Victor Burgess, Agent v. Kalvin Davon Ross, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2015
- Pueblo v. Rivera SegarraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1995