Legal Opinion
McAlpine v. Priddle
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 2014No. 6866 S-14891PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal arises from an attorney's fee dispute arbitration conducted under Alaska's Revised Uniform Arbitration Act (Revised Arbitration Act). 1 The two primary issues relate to the appropriate standard of review when a party asserts an arbitration decision was procured by fraud and the possible application of non-statutory public policy grounds to vacate an arbitration award. We adopt the federal standard for reviewing a claim that an arbitration decision was procured by fraud, and we conclude the arbitration panel's decision that there was no fraud…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,863 A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. William F. McCollough Jeanene McCollough Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lafarge Conseils Et Etudes, S.A. v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. The Howard P. Foley Company, Counterdefendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Moore v. OlsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Lee v. SheldonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
- Leroy Oenga, Jr. v. Maria M. Givens, Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond C. GivensAlaska Supreme Court · 2026