Legal Opinion

KMG Main Hurdman, Inc. v. Hood Sailmakers, Inc.

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided April 11, 1991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Sherman, PJ.

Theplaintiff, KMG Main Hurdman, Inc. (“KMG”), broughtthis action against Hood Sailmakers, Inc. (“Hood”) to recover the balance due for accounting services allegedly rendered to Hood. While two counts of the complaint were based on contract theories of recovery, Counts III and IV were claims for the balance due under a promissoiy note executed by Hood which purported to represent Hood’s indebtedness for the accounting services in question.

*58Hood’s primary defenses were negligence in the performance of the accounting services and failure of consideration with respect to the promissory…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stop & Shop Companies, Inc. v. FisherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Gamache v. Mayor of North AdamsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Gos v. BrownsteinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
  4. Bob Berman Associates, Inc. v. GrossMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  5. Gianelli v. Vatco Industries, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jensen v. JordanMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API