Legal Opinion

Bob Berman Associates, Inc. v. Gross

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided April 27, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendants appeal from a default judgment entered upon their alleged failure to comply with discovery orders. From a scant record it appears that the defendants produced nine out of twelve categories of documents sought by the plaintiff under Mass.R.Civ.P. 34, as amended, 385 Mass. 1212 (1982), and that the defendants’ assertion was plausible that documents described in two of the remaining categories were non-existent. (One category was cancelled checks or other written evidence of payment of the plaintiff s bills, which the defendants admitted had not been paid. The other was any stock…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Henshaw v. Travelers InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Partlow v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc. v. SchwartzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
  5. Litton Business Telephone Systems, Inc. v. SchwartzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roxse Homes Ltd. Partnership v. Roxse Homes, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. American Velodur Metal, Inc. v. SchinabeckMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
  3. Dao Bui v. VazquezMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
  4. AT&T Universal Card Services Corp. v. ReynoldsMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  5. Brothers v. LippMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API