Burgess v. Grooms
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CAYTON, Chief Judge.
Appellant, plaintiff below, sued for the value of electrical fixtures he had installed in defendants’ home. He alleged that defendants were building a house under a direct contract with a builder, Allen J. Lloyd; that Lloyd sub-contracted to him the electrical wiring work to be done there; but that defendants directly obligated themselves to pay him for certain fixtures installed in the house.
The trial court ordered judgment for defendants on the grounds that plaintiff had not sustained the burden of proving that he had a direct contract with defendants for the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hillyard v. Smither & Mayton, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sullivan v. Heritage FoundationDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Redd and Hill v. L & a Contracting Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963
- Richardson v. JC Flood CompanyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1963
- Brannock Associates, Inc. v. Capitol 801 Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Grunseth v. Marriott Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.