Legal Opinion

Freeman v. . Sprague

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1880PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Civil Action to recover possession of Land, removed from McDowell, and tried at Fall Term, 1879, of Caldwell Superior Court, before Schenclc, J. Verdict for defendants, judgment, appeal by plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

The plaintiffs alleging themselves to be the owners, and the defendants, William Sprague and John H. Pearson, to be in possession, seek to recover the tract of land described in their complaint on which is a valuable hotel, and damages for the wrongful withholding. At the return term of the summons, Hiram Kelley, the other defendant, on his own application, is permitted “to come into court and defend as landlord.” Thereupon the defendants put in a joint answer, denying the plaintiffs’ title, and declaring that the defendants, Sprague and Pearson, as lessees of their co-defendant, within the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. . McArthurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mobley v. . GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
  2. Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Clayton v. . RoseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882
  4. Asbury v. . FairSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  5. Guthrie v. . BaconSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API