Legal Opinion

Guthrie v. . Bacon

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This was a civil ACTION, heard upon complaint and demurrer, before MacRae, J., at September Term, 1890, of CUMBERLAND Superior Court. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Shepherd, J.:

As this action was dismissed upon demurrer, we must, of course, assume that all of the allegations of the plaintiff are true. It appears from the complaint that E. W. Bacon purchased the land in controversy at an administration sale, paid for the same with his own money, and, for the purpose of defrauding his creditors, procured it to be conveyed to W. S. Hair, who agreed, by parol, to hold it in trust for him. It also appears that the said Hair and the other defendant are claiming the land under and through the said fraudulent conveyance.

It is plain that E. W. Bacon, by reason…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Paramount Pictures Corp. v. McKenna (In Re McKenna)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
  2. Dixon v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  3. Truman v. United States (In Re Tri-Sonic, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1979
  4. Wall v. . FairleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
  5. Freeman v. . SpragueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lewis v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Oldham v. . RiegerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Price v. SlagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Hallyburton v. Slagle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Ins. Co. v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API