Legal Opinion
Port Authority Police Benevolent Ass'n v. Anglin
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 24, 2009PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.
*886For a period of time after the events of September 11, 2001, petitioner, a member of the Port Authority Police Department of New York and New Jersey, was required to work 12-hour shifts and all vacation, regular days off, personal days, and compensatory time off were cancelled. Pursuant to the collective bargaining agreement, petitioner was paid time-and-a-half for all overtime hours and for all paid vacation days worked. Petitioner retired in 2003 and respondent New York State and Local…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hohensee v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Hoffman v. New York State Policemen's & Firemen's Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Port Authority Police Benevolent Ass'n v. AnglinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by5 opinions
- Graziose v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Denson v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Graziose v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Smith v. DiNapoliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
- Murray v. Town of N. CastleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022