Legal Opinion
Reed v. Reed
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 11, 2014No. S14F0321Published
1Opinion of the Court
295 Ga. 574
FINAL COPY S14F0321. REED v. REED. HUNSTEIN, Justice. We granted the discretionary application of Appellant Stanley L. Reed (Husband) pursuant to our Rule 34 (4) in this divorce and alimony case. We affirm the trial court’s order granting a final divorce between Husband and Appellee Cynthia B. Reed (Wife) under the right-for-any-reason rule because, although the trial court erred by not dismissing Husband’s divorce complaint, the Wife’s counterclaim for divorce remained pending for independent adjudication. On August 26, 2011, Husband, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- National Tax Funding v. Harpagon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Holmes v. Roberson-HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
- Weems v. WeemsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- D.P.S. Industries, Inc. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.