Legal Opinion
Reed v. Reed
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided July 11, 2014No. S14F0321PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNSTEIN, Justice.
We granted the discretionary application of Appellant Stanley L. Reed (Husband) pursuant to our Rule 34 (4) in this divorce and alimony case. We affirm the trial court’s order granting a final divorce between Husband and Appellee Cynthia B. Reed (Wife) under the right-for-any-reason rule because, although the trial court erred by not dismissing Husband’s divorce complaint, the Wife’s counterclaim for divorce remained pending for independent adjudication.
On August 26, 2011, Husband, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint for divorce from Wife. On October 3, 2011, Wife responded…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Tax Funding v. Harpagon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Holmes v. Roberson-HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
- Weems v. WeemsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1969
- D.P.S. Industries, Inc. v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- HARDWICK-MORRISON COMPANY v. MaylandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Shelley v. Town of TyroneSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- Undisclosed LLC v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
- CITY OF DUNWOODY v. DISCOVERY PRACTICE MANAGEMENT, INC. Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- HOWELL Et Al. v. BEAULY, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- LOVELL v. RAFFENSPERGERSupreme Court of Georgia · 2024
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.