Legal Opinion

HIGGINS v. METLIFE INC.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 17, 2023No. 2:22-cv-03714Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MATTHEW HIGGINS, CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. METLIFE INC., METLIFE GROUP, INC., NO. 22-3714 and METLIFE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Matthew Higgins sued Defendants MetLife, Inc., MetLife Group, Inc., and MetLife Investment Management, LLC after he was terminated from his job with Defendant MetLife Group, Inc. (“MetLife”).1 He brings claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”),

29 U.S.C. § 621

et seq., Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 43 P.S. § 951 et…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. Dorothy Daniels v. Philadelphia School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API