Legal Opinion
Stephen Rindley, D.D.S. v. Thomas Gallagher, Marshall Brothers, D.D.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 30, 1991No. 89-6186PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
In this lawsuit filed by a dentist undergoing disciplinary proceedings, we reverse the district court’s dismissal of the lawsuit through the application of doctrines of abstention. 719 F.Supp. 1076.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Stephen Rindley is an advertising dentist who alleges that non-advertising dentists, as well as non-dentists who are economically dependent on non-advertising dentists, conspired with the Florida Department of Professional Regulation (DPR) to implement a policy of selective enforcement of the disciplinary statutes regulating the practice of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lops v. LopsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Brogdon Ex Rel. Cline v. National Healthcare Corp.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2000
- Daewoo Motor America, Inc. v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
- Trust & Investment Advisers, Inc. v. HogsettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- College Park Holdings, LLC v. Racetrac Petroleum, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.