Legal Opinion
Berryhill v. Gibson
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided September 3, 1971No. Civ. A. 3339-NPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VARNER, District Judge:
Plaintiffs in the above cause are licensed optometrists under the state law, Code of Alabama, Title 46, § 190 et seq. In October, 1965, each of the Plaintiffs was employed by Lee Optical Company or was working on the premises of said corporation in fitting glasses and doing related optometry work in association with the sale by Lee Optical Company, of glasses to the public. In October, 1965, Plaintiffs were charged by the President of the Alabama Optometric Association with having violated several sections of the Alabama optometry law in a proceeding to be…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- In Re Murchison.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gibson v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Rite Aid Corp. v. Bd. of Pharmacy of State of NJDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1976
- Housworth v. GlissonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1978
- Johnson v. Bonner County School District No. 82Idaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Roy v. JonesDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.