Legal Opinion

In Re Disciplinary Action Against Nora

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 19, 1990No. C0-88-2283PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility (Director) filed a petition for discipline alleging respondent Wendy Alison Nora violated professional responsibility standards in three separate client matters. We rejected a stipulation by the parties providing for public reprimand and two years unsupervised probation. We remanded for a hearing and appointed a referee, who subsequently filed findings of facts, conclusions and recommended discipline of a public reprimand and two years supervised probation. Nora’s initial order for a hearing transcript pursuant to Rule 14(e) of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of Disciplinary Act. Against WeyhrichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Matter of Discipline of GettySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. Matter of Discipline of CareySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State Bank of Boyd v. HatchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Disciplinary Action Against RooneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Matter Of LisseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
  3. PNC Bank v. Sheila SpencerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  4. In re Disciplinary Action Against MurrinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against PinottiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API