Sedlacek v. A.O. Smith Corp.

CONCURRING OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

¶ 1 I agree with the result reached by the Majority because we are bound by the opinion of another panel of this Court in Ranalli v. Rohm and Haas Co., 983 A.2d 732 (Pa.Super.2009). I write separately to note that I would not reach Appellants’ argument regarding Article 1, Section 11 of the Pennsylvania Constitution because Article 3, Section 18 sanctions the statutory exclusive remedy provisions that Appellants challenge as unconstitutional.

¶ 2 Article 3, Section 18 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides,

The General Assembly may enact laws requiring the…