Legal Opinion

De May v. Moore & Bruce, LLP

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 6, 2008No. Civil Action 08-845 (ESH)PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs James De May, his wife Anne Schrader-De May, and the De May Fami ly Trust have sued their lawyers Charles Bruce and Jonathon Moore, and their firm Moore & Bruce, LLP, for legal malpractice (Count I), breach of fiduciary duty with respect to Bruce’s work for the Family Trust and the charitable trust — the Optimay Foundation (Count II), and constructive fraud relating to defendants’ alleged misrepresentations regarding the tax implications of their work for De May, his wife and four foreign trusts (Count III).

The central…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bennett v. KigginsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Greene v. GreeneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Bussineau v. President of Georgetown CollegeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Fort Lincoln Civic Ass'n v. Fort Lincoln New Town Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ying Qing Lu v. LezellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
  3. Cordoba Initiative Corporation v. DeakDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. Himmelstein v. Comcast of the District, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  5. Seed Co. v. Westerman Ex Rel. Estate of WestermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API