Legal Opinion

Rossi v. Hackett

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 21, 1961No. Civ. 10101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem. *

This is an appeal by defendants and cross-defendants, Joe Hackett and Elma Hackett, from a judgment in declaratory relief in favor of plaintiff, John Rossi. Plaintiff in his complaint sought declaratory relief, or, in the alternative, damages against the appellants Hackett and defendants, Kay W. Hiatt and Alice I. Hiatt. The Hiatts have not appealed. The complaint alleges that on or about April 16, 1956, the Hiatts entered into a contract with the Haeketts under the terms of which the Hiatts agreed to sell, and the Haeketts agreed to purchase, certain real property…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Mallett v. DohertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Hill v. State Box Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Stone v. RyalsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. South Bay Irrigation District v. California-American Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. Heaps v. HeapsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  3. Nelson v. Specialty Records, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. Higson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API