Legal Opinion

State v. Dailey

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 8, 1989No. WD 40139PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANFORD, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by jury for assault, second degree, § 565.060, RSMo 1986 and armed criminal action, § 571.015.1, RSMo 1986. Appellant also sought post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15{l). These matters have been consolidated on appeal.

Appellant formally presents five points which, in summary, charge the trial court erred (1) in entering judgment for assault, second degree, because the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; (2) in failing to submit a separate instruction for armed criminal action predicated upon the offense of assault, second…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. PrestonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
  4. State v. TaylorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State v. DorseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. State v. ThurstonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. WhalenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API