In Re Marriage of Lontos
California Court of Appeal
1ConcurrenceWiener, J.
I concur in the judgment of the majority that the California court has personal jurisdiction over Mr. Lontos with reference to child and spousal support. I feel it is necessaiy, however, both for the guidance of the trial court and the parties concerned, to discuss the practical effect of our decision. Undoubtedly, now that the academic *73question of jurisdiction has been answered, Mrs. Lontos will seek a writ of execution to obtain the funds due for support under the court orders. For the reasons which I will discuss, I believe enforcement of the child and spousal support provisions of both…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Parker v. ParkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Messenger v. MessengerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Kaminski v. KaminskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Sullins v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.