State v. Bingham
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellant Dexter E. Bingham, Sr. was convicted of first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.-342, subds. 1(a) (Supp.1985). On appeal, he contends that the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction and that the circumstances do not warrant double departure from the presumptive sentence. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS. When appellant and Janet Sue Eaton (n.k.a. Janet Bingham) married in 1971, she had two daughters (T. and S.) from previous relationships. The couple thereafter had two more daughters (W. and S.B.) and a son.
Appellant began…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Ture v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. BrusvenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Dillon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. BatesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- State v. YaritzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990