Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Cobb

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 5, 2017No. COA16-990Published

1Dissent

Judge ZACHARY, dissenting

The majority opinion holds that the motion filed by 1st Atlantic Surety Company ("the surety") to set aside the forfeiture of an appearance bond "was not premised upon any ground set out under [N.C. Gen. Stat. §] 15A-544.5" and that, as a result, "the trial court lacked statutory authority to set aside the forfeiture of the appearance bond." The surety's original motion was explicitly based upon N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-544.5(b)(3) (2015), which allows a surety to apply to have a bond forfeiture set aside on the grounds that "[t]he defendant has been surrendered by a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. FennellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Granville Medical Center v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  4. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  5. In re A.R.H.B.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API