Legal Opinion
In re David H.
New York City Family Court
Decided June 3, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Alma Cordova, J.
The issues are (1) whether the presentment agency must supply additional sets of Rosario material to the same attorneys once a petition is dismissed and refiled within the speedy trial period pursuant to Family Court Act § 340.1, (2) whether failure to turn over 911 tapes of a nontestifying witness violates the Rosario rule, (3) what sanctions, if any, should be imposed on the presentment agency for failure to turn over a memo book entry of Police Officer Morales.
On March 20, 1996, the presentment agency refiled these juvenile delinquency petitions charging…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RanghelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- People v. JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Shawn L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996