Legal Opinion
State v. Gilmore
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 6, 2010No. 2010-KA-0059PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
|) Lavester Gilmore was charged by bill of information with distribution of an imitation or counterfeit substance which is represented to be a controlled dangerous substance. See La. R.S. 40:964, Schedule II A(4), and 40:971.1 A. He appeals his conviction for attempted distribution of such a substance. See La. R.S. 14:27 and La.C.Cr.P. art. 814 A(54). He assigns two errors: the first concerning the legality of the verdict returned by the jury and the second claiming the evidence is legally insufficient for the conviction. Because we conclude that the jury returned a legal…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- State v. MacOnSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
- State v. IngramLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. HamdallaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- State v. ArmsteadLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- State v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
- State v. PernellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2013
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.