Legal Opinion

Fassinger v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1996No. 64S04-9605-CR-372PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Having assessed Indiana’s drug tax against appellant James Fassinger and received some payment under the assessment, the State now seeks to try him for criminal possession of marijuana. Double jeopardy prevents it from doing so.

The prosecutor of Porter County charged appellant James Fassinger with three counts of delivery of marijuana, a class D felony, Ind.Code Ann. § 35-48-4—10 (West Supp.1995), on December 15, 1993. The Indiana Department of State Revenue subsequently issued a “jeopardy assessment” against Fas-singer for about $17,000 in tax, penalties, and interest,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bailey v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fassinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ledford v. ThomasDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2001
  2. Ex Parte WardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  3. Fassinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API