Legal Opinion

Fassinger v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 22, 1996No. 64S04-9605-CR-372Published

1Opinion of the Court

666 N.E.2d 58 (1996)

James A. FASSINGER, Appellant (Defendant Below),

v.

STATE of Indiana, Appellee (Plaintiff Below).

No. 64S04-9605-CR-372.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

May 22, 1996.

Garrett V. Conover, Chesterton, John M. Vouga, Portage, for Appellant.

Pamela Carter, Attorney General, David A. Arthur, Deputy Attorney General, Indianapolis, for Appellee.

SHEPARD, Chief Justice.

Having assessed Indiana's drug tax against appellant James Fassinger and received some payment under the assessment, the State now seeks to try him for criminal possession of marijuana. Double jeopardy prevents it from doing so.

Th…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bryant v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Bailey v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Fassinger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Fassinger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API