Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dolgen Corp. v. Hanks

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1997No. 2951417Published

1Dissent

I believe the trial court erred in granting the Hankses' motion for a new trial based on inadequacy of damages. A careful review of the record reveals that the Hankses presented evidence of the following losses:

$2,459.32 medical bills $1,934.00 amounts paid for domestic help $ 523.60 mileage for trips to and from the doctor $ 75.00 long distance telephone charges _________ $4,991.92 total losses

It is well settled that a jury verdict is presumed to be correct and that it will not be set aside as inadequate "unless the amount awarded is so inadequate as to indicate that the verdict is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kite v. WordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
  2. Vinzant v. HughesCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. Dabbs v. ThursbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API