Legal Opinion
Vinzant v. Hughes
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided March 15, 1991No. Civ. 7574PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a denial for motion for new trial on the grounds that the jury verdict was inadequate.
This action began when Doris Brenda Vinzant and Edward Lee Looney, pro se, filed a complaint against Keith Monroe Hughes alleging that Hughes negligently ran a stop sign and caused an accident, which injured Vinzant and Looney. Hughes answered denying liability for the accident and any injuries sustained by Vinzant and Looney. Following a jury trial, a verdict was returned for Vinzant in the amount of $6000, and for Looney in the amount of $248. Vinzant and Looney filed a motion for a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ashbee v. BrockSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
- Blount Brothers Construction Company v. RoseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1962
- Nemec v. HarrisCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988
- Brannon v. WebsterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- Orr v. HammondCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Kite v. WordCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1994
- Wells v. MohammadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- Savoy v. WatsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
- MAT Systems, Inc. v. Atchison Properties, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Grimes v. DodgeCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.