Legal Opinion

People v. Finley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1988No. 81221, (Calendar No. 10)Published

1Opinion of the Court

431 Mich. 506 (1988)

431 N.W.2d 19

PEOPLE

v.

FINLEY

Docket No. 81221, (Calendar No. 10).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued May 4, 1988.

Decided October 17, 1988.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Louis J. Caruso, Solicitor General, John D. O'Hair, Prosecuting Attorney, Timothy A. Baughman, Chief, Criminal Division, Research, Training and Appeals, and Jeffrey Caminsky, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for the people.

State Appellate Defender (by Peter Jon Van Hoek) for the defendant.

RILEY, C.J.

The issues in this case are whether we should require a defendant to testify at trial to preserve for review…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Brooks v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API