Hanover Fire Ins. of New York v. Western Bank & Office Supply Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Per curiam
This is an appeal by defendant, Hanover Fire Insurance Company of New York, a corporation, from a judgment rendered against it in favor of plaintiff, Western Bank & Office Supply Company, for a loss by reason of damage to a truck owned by plaintiff and insured by the defendant. At the conclusion of the evidence both parties moved for a directed verdict, and the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff.
The evidence is, in substance, without conflict. The plaintiff owned a delivery truck operated in connection with its business as an office supply company. The defendant issued a policy of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Insurance Co. v. JueschkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Baker v. Continental InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Kovero v. Hudson Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Home Insurance v. PaulSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Mullany v. Firemen's Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hayes v. Financial Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953