Legal Opinion

Brewster v. Columbia Medical Center of McKinney Subsidiary, L.P.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 14, 2008No. 05-08-00227-CVPublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice O’NEILL.

Roger and Annetta Brewster appeal1 summary judgments granted to Columbia *316Medical Center of McKinney Subsidiary, L.P., d/b/a Medical Center of McKinney (“Hospital”) and Amer Suleman, M.D. (“Doctor”) on their affirmative defense of limitations. The Brewsters raise two issues contending claims raised in their amended petition (“new claims”) are not barred because either they arise out of the same transaction as claims alleged in a timely filed original petition, or the new claims were actually alleged generally in the original petition. For the reasons set out…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Provident Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. KnottTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  2. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Diversicare General Partner, Inc. v. RubioTexas Supreme Court · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  2. Lincoln Farm, L.L.C. v. OppligerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. Murthy v. Abbott LaboratoriesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2012
  4. SJW Property Commerce, Inc. v. Southwest Pinnacle Properties, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010
  5. Sjw Property v. Southwest Pinnacle Props., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API