Legal Opinion
Davis v. ATLANTA COCA-COLA BOTTLING COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 14, 1969No. 44042PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hall, Judge.
After a verdict and judgment for the defendant in this negligence action involving collision of vehicles on a congested expressway, the plaintiff appeals.
1. Assuming but not deciding that a different verdict would have been authorized, the evidence did not demand a verdict for the plaintiff. Therefore the court did not err in entering judgment on the verdict. O’Neil v. Moore, 118 Ga. App. 424, 429 (164 SE2d 328). The case of D. G. Machinery & Gage Co. v. Hardy, 118 Ga. App. 45 (162 SE2d 852), upon which the plaintiff relies, did not hold that the evidence demanded a verdict for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nelliger v. Atlanta Baggage & Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Tift v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- O'NEIL v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
- McKinney v. PittsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- DG MACHINERY & GAGE COMPANY v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
- Ross v. Rich's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Walden v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- King v. FariesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Endsley v. Geotechnical & Environmental Consultants, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.