Superintendent of Insurance v. Attorney General
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the Court
WATHEN, Justice.
The initial question presented on this appeal is whether the Attorney General is obligated to represent and defend the Superintendent of Insurance in an action seeking review of a rate order issued by the Superintendent. Further questions are raised concerning the Attorney General’s standing to seek judicial review of the rate order in his own right, and whether such an action is barred by the fact that his office advised and assisted the Superintendent during the administrative hearings. We conclude that the Superior Court (Ken-nebec County, Chandler, J.) erred in ordering…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State of Florida Ex Rel. Robert L. Shevin, Attorney General, Plaintiff v. Exxon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Secretary of Administration & Finance v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- York v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White EagleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2001
- State v. KlattenhoffHawaii Supreme Court · 1990
- People's Insurance Counsel Division v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2001
- Lindemann v. Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election PracticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.