Legal Opinion

State v. Klattenhoff

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1990No. 14008PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PADGETT, ACTING C.J.

This case is an appeal by defendant-appellant Fritz Klattenhoff (appellant) from a conviction for two counts of theft in the first degree (Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 708-83l(l)(b)).

Appellant’s case rests on four contentions. First, appellant asserts that the Code of Professional Responsibility prohibited the Attorney General (AG) from prosecuting him in this criminal action because the AG was concurrently representing appellant in two separate and unrelated civil suits. Second, appellant asserts his right to privacy, under the United States…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Environmental Protection Agency v. Pollution Control BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Waugh v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Feeney v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re Water Use Permit ApplicationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. BatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  4. County of Kaua'i Ex Rel. Nakazawa v. BaptisteHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  5. People's Insurance Counsel Division v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API