Gwin v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1DissentDe Muniz, J.
The ultimate inquiry is whether “the relationship between the injury and the employment [is] sufficient [so] that the injury should be compensablef.]” Rogers v. SAIF, 289 Or 633, 642, 616 P2d 485 (1980). In determining whether an injury is sufficiently work related, several factors are to be considered, including: (1) whether the activity was for the benefit of the employer; (2) whether the activity was contemplated by the employer and employee at the time of hiring or later; (3) whether the activity was an ordinary risk of, and incidental to, the employment; (4) whether the employee was paid…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rogers v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- I-L Logging Co. v. Manufacturers & Wholesalers Indemnity ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Mellis v. McEWEN, HANNA, GISVOLD, RANKIN & VAN KOTEN, EMPLOYERS, AND MISSION INS. CO.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Preston v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1987