Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Rushton

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 27, 2004No. 03-4039PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

On November 26, 2002, the district court enjoined plaintiff-appellant Donald E. Armstrong from filing any further pleadings relating to the confirmation order in his Chapter 11 bankruptcy case pending this court’s resolution of his appeal of that order. Armstrong did not…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Terry Lynn Nichols v. Wayne E. Alley, District Judge, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  5. Roberts v. United States District Court for the Northern District of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. KendallDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 2006
  2. Jaramillo v. DillDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API