Legal Opinion

Murff v. Ratcliff

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 3, 1930No. 30755PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.

The defendant has appealed from a judgment, rendered in a hypothecary action, ordering him to pay the plaintiff $231.50, with interest and costs, or suffer a certain house and lot, belonging to him, to be seized and sold to satisfy a judgment held by the plaintiff against Ben Jamison, whose homestead the property once was. The defendant, Rat-cliff, held a mortgage on the property, recorded before the plaintiff’s judgment was recorded, and a waiver of Jamison’s homestead exemption; but Ratcliff neglected to have his mortgage reinscribed within ten years from the date of its registry,’and the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Succession of WengertSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  2. Krauss Co. v. MantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Krauss Co. v. MantonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  4. Gaar Ex Rel. Glover v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API