Legal Opinion

Krauss Co. v. Manton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1953No. 3727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, Judge.

The issues ■ presented by this appeal were fully covered by us when we ordered the District Judge to grant the appellant a suspensive appeal, La.App., 61 So. 2d 363. It would serve no useful purpose to restate them here. The appellee has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal based on the ground that Mrs. Wilma Mantón, wife of the defendant Mantón, was not cited in the appeal and that she was an 'appellee. It is argued by the appellee that she has an interest in asserting the homestead- right or privilege accorded her under the Constitution, Article 11, Section 1 of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thompson-Ritchie & Co. v. GravesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1929
  2. Murff v. RatcliffSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  3. Krauss Co. v. MantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krauss Co. v. MantonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
  2. Verger v. MantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. A. R. Blossman, Inc. v. MantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Glasscock v. MantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. J. J. Meyer Tire Co. v. MantonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API