In Matter of CGF
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
168 Wis.2d 62 (1992)
483 N.W.2d 803
IN the MATTER OF the GRANDPARENTAL VISITATION OF C.G.F.:
H.F. and F.F., Appellants-Petitioners,
v.
T.F. and D.L., Respondents.[]
No. 91-0293-FT.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
Oral argument March 23, 1992.
Decided May 7, 1992.
For the appellants-petitioners there were briefs by Randall E. Rhode, and Rhode Law Office, Portage and oral argument by Randall E. Rhode.
For the respondents there was a brief by Barbara S. Hughes and Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C., Madison and oral argument by Ms. Hughes.
STEINMETZ, J.
The issue in this case is whether a trial court…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- Tennessen v. TopelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Soergel v. Soergel RaufmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
- Rice v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
- H.F. v. T.F.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beckman v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Simmons v. SimmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994