Legal Opinion

In Matter of CGF

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 7, 1992No. 91-0293-FTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

168 Wis.2d 62 (1992)

483 N.W.2d 803

IN the MATTER OF the GRANDPARENTAL VISITATION OF C.G.F.:

H.F. and F.F., Appellants-Petitioners,

v.

T.F. and D.L., Respondents.[†]

No. 91-0293-FT.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Oral argument March 23, 1992.

Decided May 7, 1992.

For the appellants-petitioners there were briefs by Randall E. Rhode, and Rhode Law Office, Portage and oral argument by Randall E. Rhode.

For the respondents there was a brief by Barbara S. Hughes and Stolper, Koritzinsky, Brewster & Neider, S.C., Madison and oral argument by Ms. Hughes.

STEINMETZ, J.

The issue in this case is whether a trial court…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wood v. American Family Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Tennessen v. TopelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Soergel v. Soergel RaufmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Rice v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  5. H.F. v. T.F.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Beckman v. BoggsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  2. Simmons v. SimmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  4. In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API