Legal Opinion

Tennessen v. Topel

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The first issue is the effect of sec. 48.92 (1) and (2), Stats. 1 It is argued the language of this statute when compared with its predecessor sec. 322.07, Stats. 1951, does not mean the right to inherit through a natural parent or from other natural kin is extinguished by adoption.

The effect of adoption on the right of inheritance of the adopted person depends upon the particular wording of the statute and generally the right to inherit from one’s natural relatives after adoption is unaffected unless the statute clearly provides to the contrary. See Anno. Adoption — Inheritance from Natural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bradley v. TweedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hull v. CollinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Smith v. ReinhartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Knoeller v. UihleinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State Department of Public Welfare v. TschudyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Interest of Angel Lace M.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Sporleder v. HermesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Caldwell Ex Rel. Eberlein v. KaquatoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Soergel v. Soergel RaufmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. MARGARET H.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API