Leyman v. Bradshaw (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Appellant, Donald F. Leyman, appeals from the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeals dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Leyman contends that he is entitled to immediate release from prison because the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to convict him of and sentence him for rape and gross sexual imposition. Leyman is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus because he has not established that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm.
Facts
{¶ 2} In 1991, Leyman married a woman who had two children, a girl and a boy, from a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Morgan v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- State ex rel. Manley v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- Heddleston v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State ex rel. Cannon v. Mohr (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
- State ex rel. Davis v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
- State ex rel. Harris v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- Steele v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
- State ex rel. Whitt v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.