Legal Opinion

Leyman v. Bradshaw (Slip Opinion)

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 2016No. 2015-0367PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellant, Donald F. Leyman, appeals from the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeals dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Leyman contends that he is entitled to immediate release from prison because the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction to convict him of and sentence him for rape and gross sexual imposition. Leyman is not entitled to a writ of habeas corpus because he has not established that the trial court lacked subject-matter jurisdiction. We affirm.

Facts

{¶ 2} In 1991, Leyman married a woman who had two children, a girl and a boy, from a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. YarbroughOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Morgan v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Manley v. Walsh (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Heddleston v. MackOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Gaskins v. ShiplevyOhio Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Cannon v. Mohr (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State ex rel. Davis v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State ex rel. Harris v. Turner (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Steele v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  5. State ex rel. Whitt v. Harris (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API