Legal Opinion

People v. Houle

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 29, 1970No. Crim. 18108PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

This is an appeal from a conviction of possession of amphetamine in violation of Health and Safety Code section 11910. Appellant does not question the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction. He contends that evidence consisting of a container of amphetamine and a hypodermic n.eedle was illegally obtained and hence improperly admitted, and that a confession obtained from him and received in evidence was made without a conscious waiver of his Miranda rights. We find the contentions to be unsupported and affirm the conviction.

Appellant, while at liberty on bail,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. People v. BauerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Stapleton v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  5. People v. CheathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Grady Carroll Ouzts v. Maryland National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
  3. Dyas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States v. Sheila Lou Garlock, Now Known as Sheila Lou VorbaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. Akins v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API