Legal Opinion

United States v. Hofierka

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 16, 1996No. 95-2151, 95-2258PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This case comes to us on consolidated appeal. Appellants Michael A Hofierka and Ronald Carl Andrews separately appeal the sentences imposed on them for violating the terms of their supervised release. In both cases, the sentencing judge exceeded the sentencing range set forth in Chapter 7 of the Sentencing Guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4(a). On appeal, appellants argue: 1) that the district court was bound by the Chapter 7 sentencing range and erred in imposing a sentence in excess of this range; and 2) that the district court erred in failing to provide notice of its intent to exceed the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HofierkaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API