Legal Opinion

United States v. Christopher Lee Boot

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 7, 1994No. 93-2317PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CYR, Circuit Judge.

After the district court reduced its original sentence in response to a recent amendment to the Sentencing Guidelines, see United States Sentencing Commission, Guidelines Manual § 2D1.1 (Nov. 1993), defendant Christopher Lee Boot brought the present appeal challenging the court’s concurrent refusal to reduce his prison term below the minimum mandated by statute. Finding no error, we affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

Appellant Boot pled guilty to distributing 11.6 grams of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) within 1000 feet of a school. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1); § 860(a) (1993). For purposes…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Christopher TuckerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Jeremy D. HolmesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. NealDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Neal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. Donald PardueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. EirbyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Robert James StonekingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
  5. United States v. Meirl Gilbert NealCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API