Legal Opinion

De Arriz v. Klingler-De Arriz

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 1, 2008No. 480PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

The action of the circuit court in the instant appeal presents a classic case of the proverbial, “No good deed goes unpunished.” The court attempted to remediate retrospectively its earlier effort to absolve appellant of what it viewed as oppressive interest payments which would accrue on the monetary award granted appellee. We are tasked to determine whether it properly applied Maryland Rules 9-210 and 2-648 to prevent appellant’s law firm from establishing priority in the proceeds from the sale of the marital home over the marital award granted to appellee.

Appellants, Raul deArriz and the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Post v. BregmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
  2. Mutual Benefit Society of Baltimore, Inc. v. HaywoodCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Weitz v. MacKenzieCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Manigan v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Billingsley v. LawsonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pelletier v. BursonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API