Alabama Coalition for Equity, Inc. v. James
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partMoore, Chief Justice
I concur in the result in part and dissent in part. I not only agree that this case should be dismissed, but I would go further and say that it should be vacated. As I explain in this special writing, the trial court never had subject-matter jurisdiction over the original complaints. Therefore, the circuit court’s every act — from the first day — was illegal and is void. I cannot concur with the rationale of the majority opinion because the “Liability Order,” which was not a legal order in the first place, could never be final. Therefore, while I agree with this Court in finally ending the…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Rizzo v. GoodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.