United States v. Mabel Davis James
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
The government asks us to overrule our decision in Buck v. McLaughlin, 9 Cir., 1931, 48 F.2d 135. An alternative ground of decision in that case was that a widow’s allowance paid to her out of her husband’s estate under court order, pursuant to California law, is not “income” within the meaning of Amendment XVI to the Constitution. The questions presented by this case are narrower. Here, the widow’s allowance was ordered in an Arizona estate, and was expressly made payable out of the income of the estate. The estate had income ample to cover the payments ordered, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Commissioner v. Glenshaw Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gould v. GouldSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. Kirby Lumber CoSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. John William Gotcher Et Ux.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Estate of O'Connor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1977
- Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Rector & DavidsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Estate of McCoy v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
- Charles Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.