Legal Opinion

Akers v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided September 9, 2024No. 5:23-cv-01067Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA JAMIE AKERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-01067-JD ) ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS, ) LP, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Before the Court is Defendant AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP’s (“AstraZeneca”) Motion to Dismiss (“Motion”) [Doc. No. 16], which seeks dismissal of Plaintiff Jamie Akers’s (“Akers”) complaint [Doc. No. 1] for failure to state a claim under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Akers responded in opposition [Doc. No. 22], and AstraZeneca replied [Doc. No. 23]. For the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Khalik v. United Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. Brokers' Choice of America, Inc. v. NBC Universal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API