Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Peterson

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 15, 1919No. 9469PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to La Plata District Court, Hon. W. N. Searcy, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court · BurkeBurke, J.

November 5, 1897, one Thomas Mulligan obtained, in justice court, an alleged judgment against one Peter Peterson, for the principal sum of $80, and costs.

January 10, 1898, a transcript thereof was recorded in the District Court of La Plata County.

*102In 1912 plaintiff in error, to whom said judgment had been assigned, brought an action in the District Court of La Plata County to revive it, to which defendant in error filed a pleading, called a demurrer, alleging, among other things, that the judgment was void. This so-called demurrer was sustained by the court (Hon. Charles A. Pike, Judge), and…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Burke.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Frankel v. SatterfieldSuperior Court of Delaware · 1890
  3. Howard v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Ringle v. WestonIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Tutty v. RyanWyoming Supreme Court · 1904

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ferrier v. MorrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API